case, the tax paid receipt is produced and even considering the tax paid receipt also, the court cannot come to a conclusion that the same is prima-facie document and hence, I do not find any error in the findings of the Trial Court in rejecting the I.A.No.1 filed under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 of CPC, unless the Possession Certificate is produced before the Court to show that they are in possession of the very same suit schedule property and also earlier there was one round of litigation in O.S.No.4678/2005, wherein also the husband of the plaintiff, who had suffered the dismissal of the suit and filed an appeal in RFA No.611/2009 and unless the prima-facie case is made out and the balance of convenience lies in favour of the plaintiff/appellant and hardship, the question of granting temporary injunction does not arise. The Trial Court has considered the material on record and also the earlier judgment and confirmation with regard to the identification of the property. Hence, I do not find any grounds to set aside the orders passed by the Trial Court in both the appeals.
