In a miscellaneous first appeal filed under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act challenging a compensation award, the High Court dismissed the appeal as infructuous after the appellant paid the previously ordered cost and filed a memo seeking withdrawal.
The appeal is dismissed as having become infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2024:KHC:657-DB MFA No. 1417 of 2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2024 PRESENT
THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE H.B.PRABHAKARA SASTRY
AND
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAMACHANDRA D. HUDDAR
MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 1417 OF 2017 (MV-I)
BETWEEN:
N RAJU AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, S/O NAGARAJU, R/AT NO.11, 9TH MAIN, 3RD CROSS, BEHIND YELLAMMA TEMPLE, A.D. HALLI, BANGALORE 560 079.
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI.N.R. RANGEGOWDA., ADVOCATE) AND:
Digitally signed by SHAKAMBARI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
RESPONDENTS
THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS FILED U/S 173(1) OF THE MOTOR VEHICLE ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 03.10.2015 PASSED IN MVC NO.2639/2014 ON THE FILE OF THE XIX ADDITIONAL SMALL CAUSE JUDE, MACT, BANGALORE, (SCCH-1), PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION.
THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, DR.H.B.PRABHAKARA SASTRY J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Called again in the afternoon.
present and submits that he has paid the cost ordered by this Court on 02.01.2024 in its entirety.
of this appeal as having become infructuous.
submission, this appeal is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Sd/JUDGE
Sd/JUDGE
Sk/-
1 provisions across 1 enactments
N RAJU
THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO LTD.
MR. RAMESH B
H.B. PRABHAKARA SASTRY
RAMACHANDRA D. HUDDAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
