Appeal against divorce decree. Court held appeal abated due to death of respondent-husband during pendency.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF JUNE, 2024 PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S G PANDIT
AND
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G BASAVARAJA MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.100202 OF 2020 (MC)
BETWEEN:
SMT. RUKMAWWA @ SAVITRI, W/O. RAMAPPA PADAGANUR @ KOLUR, AGE: 35 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK, C/O. HANAMANT S/O. GANAPPA CHINCHAKHANDI, KONTIKAL, TQ: BILAGI-587116, DIST: VIJAYPURA.
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI M.M. KHANNUR, ADVOCATE)
AND:
RAMAPPA S/O. MALLAPPA PADAGANUR @ KOLUR, AGE: 39 YEARS, OCC: COOLIE, R/O: MUGALKHOD, TQ: MUDHOL-587313, DIST: BAGALKOT.
…RESPONDENT
Digitally signed by VINAYAKA B V Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 28 OF THE HINDU MARRIAGE ACT, 1955, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 07.07.2017, PASSED IN MATRIMONIAL CASE NO.23/2016 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE FIRST CLASS, MUDHOL, AT MUDHOL, DIST. BAGALKOT ALLOWING THE PETITION FILED UNDER SECTION 13(I-A)(1-B) OF THE HINDU MARRIAGE ACT, 1955 AND ETC.,
THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, S G PANDIT, J., MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Learned counsel Sri.Madanmohan M.Khannur submits
that respondent-husband has died during the pendency of the appeal.
In view of the death of respondent-husband, the appeal stands abated.
Sd/JUDGE
Sd/JUDGE
RH
List No.: 1 Sl No.: 21
Smt. Rukmawa @ Savitri
Rampappa
S G PANDIT
G BASAVARAJA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
