A civil revision petition challenging rejection of a compromise petition in an ongoing suit was withdrawn by the petitioner via memo; the court recorded the memo and dismissed the petition as withdrawn without deciding any substantive matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2024:KHC:2182 CRP No. 456 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.I.ARUN CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.456 OF 2023
BETWEEN:
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI R.V. JAYAPRAKASH, ADVOCATE FOR SRI MUNIRAJU M., ADVOCATE)
AND:
Digitally signed by H K HEMA Location: High Court of Karnataka
…RESPONDENT
THIS PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 115 OF CPC., PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 04.03.2023 IN O.S. NO.243/2019 PASSED BY THE PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, BENGALURU REJECTING THE COMPROMISE PETITION JOINTLY FILED BY THE PARTIES AND PASS SUCH OTHER ORDER OR ORDERS AS MAY BE JUST AND
NC: 2024:KHC:2182 CRP No. 456 of 2023
NECESSARY IN THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THROUGH PHYSICAL HEARING/VIDEO CONFERENCING THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Sd/JUDGE
VMB
Ashok Kumar S/o Vadivel Reddy
R. Janakamma W/o. Late N.V. Subba Rao
M.I.Arun
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
