A civil revision petition filed under Section 115 CPC challenging an order in SC No.469 of 2019 was dismissed for non-prosecution, as the petitioner neither appeared nor complied with office objections.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.I.ARUN
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.424 OF 2021
BETWEEN:
…PETITIONER
[BY SRI VICTOR MANOHARAN S., ADVOCATE (ABSENT)]
AND:
Digitally signed by H K HEMA Location: High Court of Karnataka
…RESPONDENT
THIS PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 115 OF CPC, PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE ENTIRE RECORDS IN SC NO.469 OF 2019 ON THE FILE OF THE HON'BLE XI ADDITIONAL SMALL CAUSES AND ADDITIONAL MACT., BENGALURU (SCCH-12) AND SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 10.02.2020 PASSED IN SC NO.469 OF 2019 BY THE HON'BLE XI ADDITIONAL SMALL
CAUSES AND ADDITIONAL MACT., BENGALURU (SCCH-12) AND ALLOW THE PRESENT PETITION BY DISMISSING THE SC NO.469 OF 2019, ETC.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THROUGH PHYSICAL HEARING/VIDEO CONFERENCING THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Sd/JUDGE
VMB
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Mr. Somashekar
Mr. Trevor A New Castle
M.I.Arun
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
