Petitioner-accused who had failed to make payment leading to issuance of a non-bailable warrant paid the entire balance amount with interest to the respondent by Demand Draft. The court allowed the application under Section 70(2) Cr.PC and recalled the NBW.
IA.No.2/2025 allowed; non-bailable warrant against petitioner-accused recalled.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRL.RP NO. 579/2024 (397(Cr.PC) / 438(BNSS))
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
[GG FINANCE CORPORATION (R) VS. DEEPASHREE T]
07.11.2025
(VIDEO CONFERENCING / PHYSICAL HEARING)
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for petitioner is present along with the petitioner-accused. He files a memo along with copy of the Demand Draft for having handed over the same to the respondent along with an acknowledgement of learned counsel for respondent with interest amount of Rs.7,900/- that has been paid for delay caused in making the payment of the balance amount.
The same is taken on record.
ORDER ON IA.NO.2/2025
Learned counsel for petitioner files this application under Section 70(2) of Cr.PC.
The application is perused. The cause and reasons assigned in the said application is accepted.
In view of the fact that the petitioner had not made good the payment, due to which NBW was issued. Now, the entire payment is made to the respondent by way of Demand Draft including the interest. Accordingly, IA.No.2/2025 is allowed .
CRL.RP NO. 579/2024 (397(Cr.PC) / 438(BNSS))
The NBW issued against the petitioner-accused is hereby recalled.
Hand delivery of this order is permitted.
Sd/(PRADEEP SINGH YERUR) JUDGE
LB
List No.: 1 Sl No.: 19
3 provisions across 2 enactments
GG Finance Corporation (R)
Deepashree T
Pradeep Singh Yerur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
