In a Criminal Revision regarding a cheque dishonour case, the High Court of Karnataka dismissed the petition for no prosecution due to the petitioner's absence and lack of diligent prosecution interest.
The Criminal Revision petition was dismissed for no prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2024:KHC:45316 CRL.RP No. 207 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.207 OF 2022
BETWEEN:
BENGALURU -560 016
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI NAGARAJA N, ADVOCATE -ABSENT) AND:]
Digitally signed by MALATESH K C
Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
…RESPONDENT (BY SRI NARAYANA K, ADVOCATE -ABSENT) THIS CRL.RP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 397 R/W 401 CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT OF CONVICTION AND SENTENCE PASSED BY THE LEARNED XXXIII ACMM, BANGALORE PASSED IN C.C.No.53201/2016 DATED 14.10.2020 CONVICTING THE PETITIONER/ACCUSED FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 138 OF N.I ACT AND CONFIRMED IN CRL.A.No.25157/2020 DATED 30.12.2021 AND CONSEQUENTLY AND CONSEQUENTLY ACQUIT THE PETITIONER/ACCUSED FOR THE OFFENSE P/U/S 138 OF N.I ACT.
NC: 2024:KHC:45316 CRL.RP No. 207 of 2022
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA
ORAL ORDER
Case called twice. None present on behalf of the revision petitioner. Even on the earlier dates of hearing there is no representation. This Court in the interest of justice, called for the Trial Court Records to find out any merits relating to the case.
not interested in prosecuting the matter diligently. Revision petition itself is of the year 2022, not yet admitted.
Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE
List No.: 2 Sl No.: 18
MR
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Criminal Revision petition should be disposed of in the absence of the petitioner and given the history of non-prosecution.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
N VENKATESH
B M UTTAPPA
V SRISHANANDA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
