Smt. Greemi v. State by Sakharayapatna Police
Case brief
What is this about?
Criminal revision petition withdrawn by counsel on behalf of the petitioner in the interest of justice and equity.
Criminal revision petition withdrawn by counsel on behalf of the petitioner in the interest of justice and equity.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 66 OF 2024
BETWEEN:
SMT. GREEMI, W/O KUSHALGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/O KUSHAL EXTENSION, SAKHARAYAPATNA, KADUR TALUK, CHIKKAMAGALURU DISTRICT -577 101.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. GIRISH .B BALADARE, ADVOCATE)
AND:
STATE BY SAKHARAYAPATNA POLICE, CHIKKAMAGALURU DISTRICT -577 101,
REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT BUILDING, BANGALORE – 560 001.
Digitally signed by HEMALATHA A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
…RESPONDENT (BY SRI.VINAY MAHADEVAIAH, HCGP) THIS CRL.RP IS FILED U/S.397 R/W 401 CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 21.11.2023 PASSED BY THE II ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, CHIKKAMAGALURU IN S.C.NO.113/2019 AND ALLOW THE APPLICATION FILED U/S 227 OF CR.P.C.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA
NC: 2024:KHC:44966 CRL.RP No. 66 of 2024
ORAL ORDER
After arguing the matter for sometime, learned
counsel for the revision petitioner files a memo dated 07.11.2024 for withdrawal. The memo reads as under:
“Counsel appearing for the petitioner respectfully prayed that, this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to permit the petitioner to withdraw the above petition as not pressed in the interest of justice and equity.”
dismissed as withdrawn.
the learned trial Judge while passing the impugned order shall not affect the rights of the revision petitioner in the main trial.
Sd/(V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE
DM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 65
2 provisions across 1 enactments
SMT. GREEMI
STATE BY SAKHARAYAPATNA POLICE, CHIKKAMAGALURU DISTRICT
V SRISHANANDA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court