Bail petition under Section 439 CrPC in a murder and kidnapping case was not pressed; the petitioner's counsel filed a memo withdrawing the petition, and the court dismissed it as not pressed without deciding the merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF MARCH, 2024 BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAJENDRA BADAMIKAR
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 971 OF 2024 (439)
BETWEEN:
SANTHOSH @ JEEVA S/O SRINIVASA AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS RESIDING AT HANUMANTHNAGARA PANDAVAPURA TOWN AND TALUK, MANDYA -571 812.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. RAJU C.N., ADVOCATE) AND:
STATE BY PANDAVAPURA POLICE MANDYA, REPRESENTED BY SPP HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA BANGALORE -560 001.
Digitally signed by SOWMYA D Location: High Court of Karnataka
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI.B.LAKSHMANA., HCGP)
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.439 CR.P.C PRAYING TO ENLARGE THE PETITIONER ON BAIL IN CR.NO.217/2023 OF PANDAVAPURA P.S., MANDYA FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 120-B, 364, 302, 201 R/W SEC.34 OF IPC PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE CIVIL JUDGE (Jr.Dn.) AND JMFC COURT PANDAVAPURA IN C.C.NO.1099/2023.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
NC: 2024:KHC:11841 CRL.P No. 971 of 2024
ORDER
When the matter was taken up for dictating orders,
the learned counsel for the petitioner filed a memo stating that the petitioner is not pressing the petition.
The memo is placed on record.
In view of the memo, the petition is dismissed as not
pressed.
Sd/JUDGE
DS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 50
6 provisions across 2 enactments
Santhosh @ Jeeva
State by Pandavapura Police Mandya, represented by SPP High Court of Karnataka
Rajendra Badamikar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
