A bail application petition was dismissed for non-prosecution as the petitioner's counsel was absent when called.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF MARCH, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAJENDRA BADAMIKAR CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 614 OF 2024 (439)
BETWEEN:
ARJUNKUMAR @ ARJUN, S/O JEEVARAM, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, R/AT INDIRA COLONY, WARD NO. 7, POMAVA VILLAGE, SUMERPUR TALUK, PALI DISTRICT, RAJASTHAN STATE - 306 902.
(NOW IN JUDICIAL CUSTODY)
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. KUMARA K G.,ADVOCATE)
AND:
Digitally signed by SOWMYA D Location: High Court of Karnataka
STATE BY KARNATAKA BY LASHKAR POLICE STATION, MYSURU - 570 015.
REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT BUILDING, BANGALORE - 560 001.
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. B. LAKSHMANA.,HCGP)
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 439 CR.PC PRAYING TO ENLARGE THE PETITIONER ON BAIL IN S.C.NO.293/2022
NC: 2024:KHC:11738 CRL.P No. 614 of 2024
(CR.NO.34/2022) OF LASHKAR P.S., MYSURU CITY FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 302 AND 201 OF IPC ON THE FILE OF THE III ADDL.DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MYSURU.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner called out and absent.
Hence, it is evident that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the matter. Hence, the petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/JUDGE
RAK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 36
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Arjunkumar @ Arjun
State by Karnataka, Lashkar Police Station, Mysuru
Rajendra Badamikar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
