Criminal Petition for bail filed by Harish @ Dinesh S.S. was dismissed due to non-prosecution as the petitioner's advocate was absent and no representation was made despite calls.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF MARCH, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAJENDRA BADAMIKAR
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 938 OF 2024
BETWEEN:
HARISH @ DINESH S.S., S/O SWAMY, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, R/AT SHETIGERE VILLAGE, HALEBEEDU HOBLI, BELUR TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT-573 121.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. SANDEEPA .S.H, ADVOCATE (ABSENT))
AND:
Digitally signed by SOWMYA D Location: High Court of Karnataka
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. K. NAGESHWARAPPA, HCGP FOR R1)
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 439 CR.PC PRAYING TO RELEASE THE PETITIONER ON BAIL IN SPL.C.NO.589/2023
(CRIME NO.200/2023) OF HALEBEEDU POLICE STATION AT HASSAN, PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE FTSC-I AT HASSAN, FOR THE OFFENCES P/U/Ss. 363, 376(2)(J), 34 OF IPC AND SEC. 6 OF POCSO ACT, 2012, BY ALLOWING THIS PETITION.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Though notice was ordered to be issued to Respondent
No.2, the process fee was not paid.
Learned counsel for the petitioner is called-out and absent. There was no representation on behalf of the petitioner even during the second call. Hence, the petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/JUDGE
KGR
List No.: 1 Sl No.: 7
HARISH @ DINESH S.S.
STATE OF KARNATAKA
SUMITHRA
RAJENDRA BADAMIKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
