Bail application under Section 439 Cr.PC in a murder case dismissed for non-prosecution after the petitioner's counsel repeatedly failed to appear and argue the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRL.P No. 613 of 2024 NC: 2024:KHC:13847
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF APRIL, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAJENDRA BADAMIKAR CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 613 OF 2024
BETWEEN:
PRATHAP B.R, S/O RAJU AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS, R/AT AMBEDKAR STREET, BELAVADI, MYSURU - 570 014.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. KUMARA K.G, ADVOCATE (ABSENT))
AND:
Digitally signed by SOWMYA D Location: High Court of Karnataka
STATE BY KARNATAKA BY VIJAYANAGARA POLICE STATION, MYSURU - 570 014, REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT BUILDING, BENGALURU - 560 001.
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. B. LAKSHMANA, HCGP)
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 439 OF CR.PC PRAYING TO ENLARGE THE PETITIONER ON BAIL IN S.C.NO.234/2023 (CR.NO.105/2023) OF VIJAYANAGAR P.S., MYSURU CITY FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 302, 120(b), 109, 201 R/W 34 OF IPC ON THE FILE OF THE VI ADDL.PRL.DISTRICT AND SPL.JUDGE, MYSURU.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner called out and absent.
petitioner the matter was adjourned on the last date of hearing, but he is not prepared to argue the matter. Hence, it is evident that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the matter.
Hence, the petition stands dismissed for non-
prosecution.
Sd/JUDGE
URN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 36 CT: BHK
2 provisions across 2 enactments
PRATHAP B.R
STATE BY KARNATAKA BY VIJAYANAGARA POLICE STATION, MYSURU
RAJENDRA BADAMIKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
