Petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. sought quashing of domestic violence proceedings against the petitioner. After arguing for some time, counsel sought permission to withdraw; the High Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn and disposed of pending applications.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2024:KHC:10148 CRL.P No. 5001 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF MARCH, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.NATARAJAN
CRIMINAL PETITION NO.5001 OF 2022
BETWEEN:
SRI M. RAVINDRANATH @ MANTRI RAVINDRANATH AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS R/AT “RAVINDRANATH MANTHRI” NO.15-28-53, KAMALA NAGAR MEDIPALLYA, HYDERABAD, TELANGANA STATE – 500 098 HEREIN REPRESENTED BY NEXT FRIEND SMT. MANTRI MANEMMA W/O MALLAIAH
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. RAVINDRANATH KAMATH, SR. COUNSEL FOR SMT. SHASHIREKHA M.SHETTY, ADVOCATE)
AND:
Digitally signed by JAI JYOTHI J Location: HIGH SMT. PANKAJA. T COURT OF KARNATAKA W/O M.RAVINDRANATH @ MANTI RAVINDRANATH D/O LATE T. DASHARATHA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS R/AT NO.43, 3RD CROSS NEAR AYYAPPA SWAMY TEMPLE VIDYAPEETA LAYOUT THYAGARAJANAGAR BENGALURU – 560 028.
…RESPONDENT
(BY SMT. JYNA KOTHARI, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. MEGALAMANE PRABHU, ADVOCATE)
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS IN CRL.MISC.NO.133/202021 ON THE FILE OF M.M.T.C.-II, BENGALURU, THE ORDER SHEET AND COMPLAINT ARE PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-H AND D INITIATED BY THE RESPONDENT AGAINST THE PETITIONER UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF PROTECTIONS OF WOMEN FROM DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ACT, 2005.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
After arguing the matter for some time, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the petition.
withdrawn .
In view of dismissal of the main petition, all pending I.As., if any, do not survive for consideration and it is disposed of.
Sd/JUDGE
PB
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Sri M. Ravindranath @ Mantri Ravindranath (represented by next friend Smt. Mantri Manemma)
Smt. Pankaja T
K.Natarajan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
