Anticipatory bail petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C. in a case under Sections 380 and 457 IPC was dismissed for non-prosecution as the petitioner's counsel was absent on consecutive hearing dates.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF APRIL, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAJENDRA BADAMIKAR CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 1415 OF 2024
BETWEEN:
MOHAMMED JUBER AND JUBER S/O LATE YUNAS AGED ABOUT 18 YEARS R/AT NEAR LEELA TALKIES ASHRAYA BADAVANE, HUNSUR PIN CODE -571 105
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI LETHIF B, ADVOCATE)
AND:
Digitally signed by SOWMYA D Location: High Court of Karnataka
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI B.LAKSHMANA, HCGP)
THIS CRL.P IS FILED UNDER SECTION 438 CR.PC PRAYING TO GRANT ANTICIPATORY BAIL IN THE EVENT OF HIS ARREST IN CR.NO.7/2023 (C.C.NO.161/2023) OF HUNSUR
TOWN POLICE STATION, FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 380, 457 OF IPC, PENDING ON THE FILE OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HUNSUR.
THIS CRL.P, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner is called out and
he is absent.
prosecution.
Sd/JUDGE
MR
List No.: 1 Sl No.: 26
3 provisions across 2 enactments
Mohammed Juber and Juber s/o Late Yunas
The State of Karnataka by Hunsur Town Police, Mysuru District
Siddaramu s/o Late Mollegowda
Rajendra Badamikar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
