Criminal Petition filed to quash orders dismissing discharge application. Petitioner failed to comply with peremptory order regarding office objections within two weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2024:KHC:32577 CRL.P No. 1312 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 1312 OF 2022
BETWEEN:
JOHN SAMUEL DAVID S/O J A DAVID AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS OCC: RETIRED EMPLOYEE R/AT NO.AK 43, 9TH STREET 11 MAIN ROAD, ANNA NAGAR WEST CHENNAI - 60040
Digitally signed by NAGAVENI (BY SRI. DINESH KUMAR RAO K., ADVOCATE) Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
AND:
…PETITIONER
SHIVMOGGA RURAL POLICE STATION SHIVMOGGA - 577201 (REP. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT BUILDINGS BENGALURU - 560 001)
NC: 2024:KHC:32577 CRL.P No. 1312 of 2022
S/O T V EASHWARAYYA AGE OF 58 YEARS OCC: BUSINESSMAN R/AT: VEERESHKRUPA 1ST CROSS, BASAVNAGUDI SHIVMOGGA - 577 201
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. THEJESH P., HCGP FOR R1)
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 CR.P.C PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 21.09.2021 PASSED BY THE III ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE AT SHIVAMOGGA IN CRL.RP NO.32/2021 AND THE ORDER DATED 20.02.2021 PASSED BY THE JMFC III COURT, SHIVAMOGGA IN C.C.NO.51/2018 DISMISSING THE APPLICATION FILED BY PETITIONER FOR DISCHARGE U/S.239 OF CRPC AND ALLOW THE APPLICATION AND DISCHARGE THE PETITIONER FOR THE ALLEGED OFFENCE (REGISTERED FOR OFFENCE P/U/S.420 R/W SEC.34 OF IPC).
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
NC: 2024:KHC:32577 CRL.P No. 1312 of 2022
ORAL ORDER
This Court, on 18.06.2024 had passed a peremptory
order, which reads as follows:
“Two weeks time is granted to comply with the office objections, failing which, petition would be dismissed without reference to the Bench.
In the event, the office objections are complied with, list the matter before the Court at the appropriate stage without a memo.”
Even today, the learned counsel for petitioner has not
complied with the office objections. Therefore, the petition is
dismissed for its non-prosecution.
Sd/(M.NAGAPRASANNA)
JUDGE
KG List No.: 1 Sl No.: 191
John Samuel David
The State
T.E. Shivkumar
M.Nagaprasanna
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
