Dismissed

Vinayak S/O. Narayan Bhat, v. the State of Karnataka

Karnataka HC23 Oct 2024CRL.P/102015/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Regular bail petition under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for an accused in a Sessions Case involving IPC 302, 307, 504 and 109/34 offences; withdrawn as not pressed with liberty to reapply after two eye witnesses are examined.

What did the court decide?

Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file fresh bail petition after examination of witnesses CWs.18 and 19; trial court and prosecution requested to examine them on priority.

Vinayak S/O. Narayan Bhat, Vs the State of… — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Karnataka HC (2024)

¶1

¶2

NC: 2024:KHC-D:15422 CRL.P No. 102015 of 2024

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,

¶4

DHARWAD BENCH

¶5

DATED THIS THE 23^RD DAY OF OCTOBER, 2024

¶6

BEFORE

¶7

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.VISHWAJITH SHETTY

¶8

CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 102015 OF 2024

¶9

BETWEEN:

¶10

VINAYAK S/O NARAYAN BHAT AGE. 40 YEARS OCC. DRIVER, R/O. SHEDKULI BHATRAKERI, HADINBAL TALUK HONNAVAR DIST. UTTARA KANNADA - 581 361.

¶11

…PETITIONER

¶12

(BY SRI H.B. RUDRESH, ADV.,) AND:

¶13

Digitally signed by NANDINI MS Location: High Court of Karnataka

¶14

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS P.S.I., HONNAVAR POLICE STATION, R/BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT BUILDING, DHARWAD - 011.

¶15

(BY SMT. GIRIJA HIREMATH, HCGP)

¶16

…RESPONDENT

¶17

THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED U/S 439 OF CR.P.C., SEEKING TO ALLOW THE PETITION FILED U/S 439 OF CR.P.C. AND ENLARGE THE PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.1 ON REGULAR BAIL IN SESSIONS CASE NO.12/2024 (CRIME NO.0244/2023 OF HONNAVAR POLICE STATION) PENDING ON THE FILE OF COURT OF THE 2 ND ADDL.DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, UTTARA KANNADA, KARWAR FOR AN OFFENCES PUNISHABLE U/S 302, 307, 504, 109 R/W SECTION 34 OF IPC.

¶18

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

¶19

¶20

NC: 2024:KHC-D:15422 CRL.P No. 102015 of 2024

¶21

CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.VISHWAJITH SHETTY

¶22

ORAL ORDER

¶23

(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.VISHWAJITH SHETTY)

¶24

Learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing the matter for some time submits that, the petition may be dismissed at this stage as not pressed with liberty to file a fresh petition, after examination of eye witnesses CWs.18 and 19 is completed before the Trial Court.

¶25

The said submission is not opposed by the learned

¶26

HCGP.

¶27

The petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty

¶28

as prayed for. Considering the fact that the petitioner is in custody from 01.12.2023, the Trial Court as well as the prosecution are requested to make endeavour to examine CWs.18 and 19 before the Trial Court on priority.

¶29

Sd/(S.VISHWAJITH SHETTY) JUDGE

¶30

NMS

Vinayak S/O. Narayan Bhat, v. the State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vinayak S/O. Narayan Bhat, v. the State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

N Raisa Begum Vs the State of Karnataka and Anr.

Ati Sonam Kaur Vs Deputy Commissioner of Excise Kalaburagi

Sri Raju S/O Bandu Naik Vs the State of Karnataka

Sonu Alias Mohammadsonu Vs the State of Karnataka

Bhimrao Vs the State of Karnataka

Lakshmikanth Vs the State of Karnataka