Sri. Mirle Varadaraj v. Sri. Dayananda. K. a.
Case brief
What is this about?
Chief Justice disposed of the contempt petition by closing it following an uncontestable memo from the Government Advocate and granted liberty to the complainant to challenge the endorsement.
What did the court decide?
Contempt petition closed with liberty to challenge the endorsement rejecting the complainant's application.
What the court decided
- 1 -
NC: 2024:KHC:5615-DB CCC No. 106 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2024
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR P.S.DINESH KUMAR, CHIEF JUSTICE
AND
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE T.G. SHIVASHANKARE GOWDA
CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 106 OF 2024
BETWEEN:
- SRI. MIRLE VARADARAJ S/O. LATE BOREGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, (SENIOR CITIZEN BENEFIT NOT CLAIMED), RESIDING AT NO. 544, 5TH MAIN, KENGERI UPANAGARA, BANGALORE-560 060. …COMPLAINANT
(BY SRI. SAMMITH. S.,ADVOCATE)
Parties & counsel
- respondent
STATE OF KARNATAKA
Coram
P.S.DINESH KUMAR
T.G. SHIVASHANKARE GOWDA
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Karnataka HC
- Decided on
- · February
- Registered
- Case no.
- CCC/106/2024
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court