Contempt petition for willful disobedience of an interim stay order. The Court found substantial compliance as the complainant's services were continued and the impugned withdrawal letter was withdrawn. Proceedings dropped.
Further proceedings dropped.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF JUNE, 2024
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S G PANDIT
AND
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G BASAVARAJA
CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO.100081 OF 2024
BETWEEN:
SRI DANESHWARI SEVA SAMSTHE BELAGAVI, A REGISTERED SOCIETY UNDER THE KARNATAKA SOCIETIES REGISTRATION, ACT, 1960, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, SRI PRAVEEN S/O. CHANDRAKANT RUGE, AGED ABOUT: 29 YEARS, OCC: SECRETARY, R/O: ANJANEYA NAGAR, M.M. EXTENSION, BELAGAVI, TQ. AND DIST. BELAGAVI-590001.
…COMPLAINANT
(BY SRI G.I. GACHCHINAMATH, ADVOCATE)
AND:
Digitally signed by VINAYAKA B V Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
…PROFORMA PARTY
(BY SRI G.K. HIREGOUDAR, GOVT. ADVOCATE)
THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTION 11 AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971, R/W. ARTICLE 215 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, 1950, PLEASED TO, INITIATE AND PUNISH THE ACCUSED/RESPONDENT FOR WILLFUL DISOBEDIENCE OF THE ANNEXURE-B ORDER DATED 31-3-2023 MADE IN WRIT PETITION NO.101995/2023 PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE UNDER THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT AND ETC.,
THIS CCC, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS S G PANDIT, J., MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
This contempt petition is filed complaining disobedience of the interim order dated 31.03.2023 passed in Writ Petition No.101995/2023 by the learned Single Judge.
Sd/JUDGE
Sd/JUDGE
RH
List No.: 1 Sl No.: 38
2 issues framed by the court
Whether there was willful disobedience of the interim order dated 31.03.2023 staying the circular dated 17.03.2023?
Whether the subsequent communication withdrawing services constituted non-compliance with the stay order?
2 provisions across 2 enactments
S G PANDIT
G BASAVARAJA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
