The Karnataka High Court dismissed an unprosecuted writ petition filed in 2018 after more than five years, as the petitioner appeared neither personally nor via video conferencing at the hearing.
None. The Writ Petition was dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2023:KHC:38689 WP No. 9744 of 2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 31ST DAY OF OCTOBER, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO.9744 OF 2018 (L-RES)
BETWEEN:
M/S. KONARK POWER PROJECTS LIMITED., REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, MR. INUMULA RAJ BABU, S/O INUMULA RAJESHAM, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, BALLAPURA VILLAGE, BUGUDANAHALLI PANCHAYAT, TUMKUR TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT - 572 107.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. FAYAZ SAB.B.G., ADVOCATE [ABSENT])
AND:
Digitally signed by THEJASKUMAR N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
ALL ARE REPRESENTED BY THE PRESIDENT, KONARK POWER PROJECT EMPLOYEES UNION, BALLAPURA GRAMA, BUGUDANAHALLI PANCHAYATH, TUMAKURU DISTRICT, TUMAKURU - 572 201.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. T.S.ANANTHARAM., ADVOCATE)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS.
NC: 2023:KHC:38689 WP No. 9744 of 2018
THIS WRIT PETITION IS COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
When the matter is called, there is no representation on behalf of petitioner either personally or through video conferencing.
As could be seen from the Writ Papers, the petition is filed in the year 2018. Now we are in the month of October 2023. The appeal is pending since five years. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition.
As already noted above, when the matter is called there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner either personally or through video conferencing. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/JUDGE
TKN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 23
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M/s. Konark Power Projects Limited.
Sri. H.Kamaraj and others
Jyoti Mulimani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
