Petitioner challenged an order denying retrial benefits due to his role as a part-time teacher on consolidated pay. The court found no infirmity in the original order and dismissed the writ petition.
Order dated 01.10.2010 (Annexure-E) dismissed; writ petition dismissed; no financial or promotional benefits granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP NO.69887 OF 2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 03RD DAY OF JANUARY, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH
WRIT PETITION NO.69887 OF 2012 (S-R)
BETWEEN:
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. JAGADISH PATIL, ADVOCATE)
AND:
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI VINAYAK KULKARNI, AGA FOR R1-R4)
WP NO.69887 OF 2012
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO: 1] QUASH THE ORDER ISSUED BY RESPONDENT NO.4 DTD.01.10.2010 AT VIDE ANNEXURE-E. 2] DIRECTING THE AUTHORITIES TO GRANT ALL FINANCIAL AND PROMOTIONAL BENEFITS TO THE PETITIONER.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R
Heard Sri Jagadish Patil, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Sri Vinayaka Kulkarni, learned Additional Government Advocate for the respondent-State.
WP NO.69887 OF 2012
2010 passed by the respondent-authority. Resultantly, petition
stands dismissed.
Sd/JUDGE
LNN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 72
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner, appointed as a part-time teacher on consolidated pay, is entitled to retrial benefits and promotion.
Whether the order denying retrial benefits to a part-time teacher on consolidated pay is legally sustainable.
Whether the High Court should interfere under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India in this matter.
Aravind Bandopant Sarjoshi
State of Karnataka
E.S. Indires
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
