Syed Naseeruddin v. the Karnataka State Board of Auqaf
Case brief
What is this about?
In a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution, the High Court of Karnataka directed the Karnataka State Board of Auqaf to consider the petitioner's representation dated 31.10.2022 and pass appropriate orders within eight weeks to comply with prior court directives.
What did the court decide?
Directed the respondent Board to consider the petitioner's representation and pass appropriate orders within eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
What the court decided
NC: 2023:KHC:44541 WP No. 6393 of 2023
- 1 -
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
WRIT PETITION NO. 6393 OF 2023 (GM-WAKF)
BETWEEN:
SYED NASEERUDDIN AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, S/O LATE SYED MOIDDIN, NO.6, PUTTAIAH COMPOUND, 4TH CROSS, ASHWATHNAGAR, BANGALORE-560 094.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. DILIP KUMAR I.S., ADV.)
AND:
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Board of Auqaf should consider the petitioner's representation seeking implementation of court orders.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Syed Naseeruddin
- respondent
The Karnataka State Board of Auqaf
- respondent
The Managing Committee Madeena Masjid
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Karnataka HC
- Decided on
- · December
- Registered
- Case no.
- WP/6393/2023
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court