Petitioner filed writ petition under Articles 226/226 seeking quashment of maintenance order. Petition was voluntarily withdrawn by petitioner with liberty to file fresh petition. Writ petition dismissed.
Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file fresh petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2023:KHC:39219 WP No.6307/2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K V ARAVIND WRIT PETITION No.6307/2023 (GM-FC)
BETWEEN:
M KOTTURESH S/O MALLESHAIAH AGE 32 YEARS EMPLOYEE IN PRIVATE COMPANY R/O NO.470/4, KRISHNA REDDY BUILDING 3RD FLOOR 1ST HOUSE, K E B OPPOSITE ROAD 2ND CROSS, OPP TO R G AKSHAY APARTMENT SARJAPUR ROAD, ATTIMBELE (adjacent ROAD OF NANDISHREE DELUXE HOTEL) BENGALURU 562107
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. K. P. JAYASIMHA.,ADVOCATE)
AND:
Digitally signed by PRABHU KUMARA NAIKA Location: High Court of Karnataka
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH ANNEXURE-A UNDER SECTION 125 OF CR.P.C FOR GRANT OF MAINTENANCE, JUDGEMENT DTD 01.03.2021 PASSED BY THE COURT OF JUDGE, FAMILY COURT AT DAVANAGERE IN CRL.MISC.NO.58/2017.
NC: 2023:KHC:39219 WP No.6307/2023
THIS WRIT PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Learned Counsel for the petitioner files a memo seeking withdrawal of the petition with a liberty to file fresh petition.
Memo is taken on record.
Registry is directed to return originals/certified copies after substituting Xerox copies, if request is made.
Sd/JUDGE
PKN
List No.: 1 Sl No.: 4
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M Kotturesh S/O Mallesthai
Smt Sarvamangala K G @ Sowmya
Chaitanya K D/O Kotturesh
K V Aravind
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
