Disposed

Arpitha Vidya Nikethana Higher Primary School v. the State of Karnataka

Karnataka HC23 May 2023WP/5805/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court dismissed the writ petition filed by an educational institution challenging its withdrawal of recognition. Pending the Principal Secretary's consideration of a representation, the petition stood disposed of without substantive adjudication.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition disposed of. Authorities directed to consider Principal Secretary's direction and pass appropriate orders.

Arpitha Vidya Nikethana Higher Primary School Vs… — Education and Admissions | Karnataka HC (2023)

¶1

¶2

WP No. 5805 of 2023

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶4

DATED THIS THE 23^RD DAY OF MAY, 2023

¶5

BEFORE

¶6

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM WRIT PETITION NO. 5805 OF 2023 (EDN-RES)

¶7

BETWEEN:

¶8

ARPITHA VIDYA NIKETHANA HIGHER PRIMARY SCHOOL, RAGHAVENDRA NAGAR, BAALEGADDE, SAKALESHAPURA TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT-573127, UNDER THE MANAGEMENT OF ARPITHA VIDYA SAMSTHE, ALUR, ALUR TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT REP BY ITS SECRETARY

¶9

…PETITIONER

¶10

(BY SRI. SOMASHEKHARAIAH R P, ADVOCATE)

¶11

AND:

¶12

Digitally signed by CHAITHRA A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶13

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPT. OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560001

¶14

THE COMMISSIONER DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS, K R CIRCLE, BENGALURU-560001

¶15

THE DIRECTOR OF SECONDARY EDUCATION DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS, NRUPATHUNGA ROAD, BENGALURU-560001

¶16

THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR DEPT. OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS, HASSAN DIST.

¶17

¶18

WP No. 5805 of 2023

¶19

HASSAN-573220

¶20

BLOCK EDUCAITON OFFICER

¶21

DEPT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS, SAKLESHAPURA, HASSAN DISTRICT-573220

¶22

…RESPONDENTS

¶23

(BY SMT.PRAMODHINI KISHAN, AGA)

¶24

THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE NOTICE DT:17.03.2014 IN NO.SI3/A.KRU.SHAALE/116/12-13/984 PASSED BY R-5 UNDER ANNX-E TO THE WRIT PETITION AND ETC.,

¶25

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

¶26

ORDER

¶27

The captioned writ petition is filed by the petitioner-

¶28

Institution questioning the order wherein the petitionerInstitution is directed not to admit students on account of withdrawal of recognition.

¶29

The petitioner-Institution has now filed an application seeking a direction. Along with the

¶30

interlocutory application, the petitioner has placed on record the communication issued by the office of the Principal Secretary addressed to the Commissioner to

¶31

3 - WP No. 5805 of 2023

¶32

consider the petitioner's representation and thereafter take appropriate action in accordance with law.

¶33

In view of subsequent development as indicated in Annexure-G, the captioned writ petition does not survive for consideration. Since there is already a direction issued by the office of the Principal Secretary to consider the petitioner's representation, I am of the view that the writ petition does not survive for consideration.

¶34

Accordingly, writ petition stands disposed of.

¶35

The authorities are hereby directed to consider the direction issued by the office of the Principal Secretary and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law.

¶36

The pending interlocutory application, if any, does

¶37

not survive for consideration and stands disposed of.

¶38

Sd/JUDGE

¶39

CA List No.: 1 Sl No.: 37

Arpitha Vidya Nikethana Higher Primary School v. the State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Arpitha Vidya Nikethana Higher Primary School v. the State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt. Kadiramma Vs State of Karnataka

Smt. Nanki Bai Vs the Deputy Commissioner

Sri Shivappa S Vs State of Karnataka

Dr Sunil Hegde Vs State of Karnataka

Sri C B Manjunath Vs the Deputy Commissioner

Aruna Convent Vs the State of Karnataka