Petitioner filed a writ petition challenging a family court order. The court observed the underlying maintenance case had already been disposed of. Consequently, the court held the writ petition infructuous and dismissed it.
Writ petition dismissed as having become infructuous due to disposal of the underlying maintenance case.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 02ND DAY OF JANUARY, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI
WRIT PETITION No.5605 OF 2017 (GM-FC)
BETWEEN:
SRI RAVINDRA C., S/O MR.HARINATH C., AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, R/O NO.8, 21ST MAIN, RKS MANSION, EJIPURA, BENGALURU - 560 047. ... PETITIONER
(BY SRI MIRZA FAIZAN ASSAD, ADVOCATE)
AND:
SMT.NIKITHA S.B., D/O MR.BHASKAR S.B., AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS, R/O 669B, GURU KARAYA NILAYA, 6TH MAIN, 4TH CROSS, NEAR RAMA ANJANEYA GUDI, HANUMANTHANAGAR, BANGALORE - 560 019. ... RESPONDENT
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASHING OR SETTING ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 26.10.2016 VIDE I.A.NO.3 NAMELY ANNEXURE-A PASSED BY THE PRINCIPAL JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, AT BANGALORE IN M.C.NO.3288/14. THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
2
ORDER
The captioned Writ Petition is filed against the order dated 26.10.2016 passed by the Principal Judge, Family Court, Bengaluru on I.A.No.3 filed under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act by the respondent in M.C.No.3288/2014.
The case status of the MC case has been verified by the registry through e-court services and it depicts that the MC case has been disposed of on 02.11.2017. Because the MC case is already disposed of, the Writ Petition becomes infructuous.
Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Sd/JUDGE
TKN
3 provisions across 2 enactments
Sri Ravindra C.
Smt. Nikitha S.B.
Jyoti Mulimani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
