This order records that the writ petition seeking to quash the calendar of events for a society election was dismissed on the ground that the petition had become infructuous. No legal proposition is settled.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 09TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI
WRIT PETITION No.5571 OF 2019 (CS-EL/M)
BETWEEN:
ALL ARE MEMBERS OF DODDAGANJURU MILK PRODUCERS CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD, DODDAGANJURU, CHINTAMANI TALUK, CHICKBALLAPUR DISTRICT.
... PETITIONERS
(BY SRI JAI PRAKASH REDDY M., ADVOCATE)
AND:
2
(BY SMT.RASHMI PATEL, HCGP FOR R1, R2 & R4; SRI M.KESHAV REDDY, ADVOCATE FOR R3; R5 -SERVED)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE CALENDER OF EVENTS DATED 16.01.2019 ISSUED BY RESPONDENT NO.4 VIDE ANNEXURE-A AND ETC.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Sri.Jai Prakash Reddy.M., learned counsel for
petitioners has appeared through video conferencing.
3
Smt.A.R.Sharadamba., learned AGA for respondents
1, 2 & 4 has appeared in person.
Counsel Sri.Jai Prakash Reddy.M., submits that the Writ Petition may be dismissed as having become infructuous.
The oral submission made on behalf of learned
counsel for petitioner is placed on record.
The Writ Petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Sd/JUDGE
TKN
1 provisions across 1 enactments
B.L.THAMMA REDDY AND OTHERS
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
THE DEPUTY REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES
CO-OPERATIVE ELECTION AUTHORITY
THE RETURNING OFFICER
DODDAGANJURU MILK PRODUCERS CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD
JYOTI MULIMANI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
