The High Court of Karnataka dismissed a writ petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India as having become infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 06TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI
WRIT PETITION No.6749 OF 2017 (GM-FC)
BETWEEN:
SMT.NAGARATHNA, W/O.SHIVANANDA HEGGADE, D/O.LATE SHINGAPPA GOWDA, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, R/AT MANDAGADDE, THYAVANA POST, SRINGERI TALUK-577139.
... PETITIONER
(BY SRI.SRIDHAR, ADVOCATE FOR SRI.CHANDRASEHKAR, ADVOCATE)
AND:
B.R.SHIVANANDA HEGGADE, S/O.B.K.RAMAPPA HEGGADE, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/AT BALEHALLI VILLAGE, THIRTHAHALLI TALUK-577 432.
... RESPONDENT
(BY SRI.CHANDRASHEKAR, ADVOCATE)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 16.07.2016 PASSED BY SR. CIVIL JUDGE, ITINERARY COURT IN M.C.NO.13/2015 AT ANNEX-A AND ETC.
2
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PREIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Sri.Shridhar.R., learned counsel on behalf of Sri.Ashwath.C.M., for petitioner has appeared through video conferencing.
Sri.Chandrashekar., learned counsel for respondent has appeared in person.
Counsel Sri.Shridhar.R., submits that the Writ Petition may be dismissed as having become infructuous.
The oral submission made on behalf of learned counsel for petitioner is placed on record.
The Writ Petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Sd/-
JUDGE
TKN
Smt. Nagaratna
B.R. Shivananda HeggaDE
Jyoti Mulimani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
