Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution read with Section 482 CrPC was dismissed for non-prosecution as the petitioner was absent despite being heard twice.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R. NATARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 5524 OF 2020 (GM-RES)
BETWEEN:
SRI. ARUN KUMAR S/O LATE K. KIRSHNAMURTHY, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, R/AT NO.25, 4TH CROSS, BINNY LAYOUT, VIJAYANAGARA 2ND STAGE, ATTIGUPPE, BANGALORE-560 040
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. MANU SHANKAR S.S., ADVOCATE (ABSENT))
AND:
Digitally signed by SUMA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. RAJAT SUBRAMANYAM, HIGH COURT GOVERNMENT PLEADER FOR RESPONDENT NOS.1 TO 4)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH SECTION 482 OF THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 PRAYING TO CALL FOR RECORDS FROM THE RESPONDENT NO.1, 2 AND 4 AND QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 14.03.2016 BEARING NO.CiAaaSue 14 SeeLoU 2016 PASSED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT VIDE ANNEXURE-D AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
There is no representation for the petitioner though the petition is called twice in the day.
It is seen that even on the last date of hearing, there was no appearance on behalf of the petitioner. Hence, this petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
PMR
List No.: 1 Sl No.: 26
Sd/JUDGE
SRI. ARUN KUMAR S/O LATE K. KIRSHNAMURTHY
STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF PERSONNEL AND ADMINISTRATIVE REFORMS
R. NATARAJ
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
