Writ petition challenging non-consideration of representation for land acquisition compensation. Court directed respondents to look into grievance within three months without brooking delay.
Respondents directed to look into petitioner's grievance within three months without brooking delay.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP No. 5402 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNA S DIXIT
WRIT PETITION NO. 5402 OF 2022 (LA-KIADB)
BETWEEN:
SRI. MARAIAH, SONOF KOORLAPPA, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, R/AT THALAGUPPE VILLAGE, BIDADI HOBI, RAMANAGARA TALUK 562 109. (BENEFIT OF SENIOR CITIZENSHIP NOT CLAIMED)
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. SRINIVASAN T.,ADVOCATE)
AND:
Digitally signed by CHETAN B C Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. R SRINIVASA GOWDA, AGA FOR R1; SRI. H L PRADEEP KUMAR., ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)
WP No. 5402 of 2022
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R2 AND 3 TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION OF THE PETITIONER IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW, VIDE ANNEXURE-A AND CONSEQUENTLY GRANT 10781 SQ.FT OF DEVELOPED LAND FOR EACH ACRE OF LAND BELONGING TO THE PETITIONER WHICH IS ACQUIRED WITHIN REASONABLE TIME
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
The short grievance of the Petitioner is as to non-
consideration of his subject representation wherein he has sought for grant of Rs.10781/- per Sq. ft. of developed land.
Respondent and learned Panel Counsel appearing for Respondent Nos. 2 & 3 oppose the Petition contending that the relief which the Petitioner has sought for is in terms of
Government Order dated 23.02.2021 and therefore, acquisition done prior to the above date are not covered by the same. Having so contended, learned Panel Counsel appearing for the KIADB now agrees to instruct his clients
WP No. 5402 of 2022
to look into the grievance of the Petitioner in accordance with law and in a time bound way. This is appreciable.
In view of the above, this Writ Petition is disposed
off. Costs having been made easy. All contentions are kept open.
Time for compliance is three months.
It is open to the answering Respondents to call for any information/documents from the side of the Petitioner for due consideration of subject Representation; however, in the guise of such solicitation, no delay shall be brooked.
Sd/JUDGE
Bsv
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the State and Industrial Development Board should consider the petitioner's representation for grant of developed land within reasonable time.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sri. Maraiah
State of Karnataka
Special Land Acquisition Officer-I, Karnataka Industrial Development Board
Secretary, Karnataka Industrial Development Board
Krishna S Dixit
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
