A writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear despite being listed multiple times.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 04TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI
WRIT PETITION No.5284 OF 2017 (GM-WAKF)
BETWEEN:
MR.ABDUL ISMAIL, S/O ABDULLA, AGE 42 YEARS, AZEEZUDDIN ROAD, BUNDER, MANGALORE. ... PETITIONER
AND:
2
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE PROCEEDINGS OF RESPONDENT NO.1 VIDE ITS ORDER NO.KSBA/BLS/85/DKD/2015-16 DATED 06.04.2016 AT ANNEXURE-K.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
There is no representation on behalf of petitioner.
Sri.Praveen., learned counsel on behalf of
Sri.M.H.Haneef., for respondent No.1 has appeared in person.
As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the petition was listed on 08.03.2022 and 30.11.2022. On these days, there was no representation on behalf of petitioner.
The petition is listed today.
3
As already noted above, today also there is no representation on behalf of petitioner. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/JUDGE
TKN
Mr. Abdul Ismail
The Chief Executive Officer, Karnataka State Board of Wakfs
The Waqf Officer
The Chairman, Masjid Zeenath Baksh
Jyoti Mulimani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
