Disposed

Sri. S.V. Somashekar v. Sri. S. Ramachandran

Karnataka HC28 Nov 2023WP/37182/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Karnataka disposed of two connected writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. The court held that the petitions were rendered infructuous following a judgment and decree by the Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge dated 25.09.2023 in the underlying suits.

What did the court decide?

Petitions disposed of as infructuous in view of judgment in main suits.

Sri. S.V. Somashekar Vs Sri. S. Ramachandran — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Karnataka HC (2023)

¶1

1 - NC: 2023:KHC:42992 WP No. 37182 of 2016 C/W WP No. 8216 of 2016

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶3

DATED THIS THE 28^TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2023 BEFORE

¶4

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO. 37182 OF 2016 (GM-CPC)

¶5

C/W

¶6

WRIT PETITION NO. 8216 OF 2016 (GM-CPC)

¶7

IN WP NO. 37182/2016

¶8

BETWEEN:

¶9

SRI. S.V. SOMASHEKAR AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, S/O LATE VENKATAPPA, R/A SHIVAPURA VILLAGE, PEENYA POST, BANGALORE-560058.

¶10

…PETITIONER

¶11

(BY SRI.P.N. RAJESHWARA., ADVOCATE)

¶12

AND:

¶13

Digitally signed by NARASIMHA MURTHY VANAMALA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶14

SRI. S. RAMACHANDRAN AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, S/O LATE SUBBAIAH, R/A NO.91, 15^TH CROSS, P.T.COLONY, CHOLURPALYA, MAGADI ROAD, BANGALORE-560023.

¶15

…RESPONDENT

¶16

(NOTICE HELD SUFFICIENT TO RESPONDENT) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH /

¶17

¶18

NC: 2023:KHC:42992 WP No. 37182 of 2016 C/W WP No. 8216 of 2016

¶19

SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER AT ANNEX-F DATED 28.6.2016 PASSED ON I.A.NO.2 FILED BY THE RESPONDENT UNDER SECTION 151 CPC IN O.S.569/2015 ON THE FILE OF XXII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BANGALORE.

¶20

IN WP NO. 8216/2016

¶21

BETWEEN:

¶22

SRI. S.V. SOMASHEKAR AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, S/O LATE VENKATAPPA, R/A SHIVAPURA VILLAGE, PEENYA POST, BANGALORE-560058.

¶23

…PETITIONER

¶24

(BY SRI.P.N. RAJESHWARA., ADVOCATE) AND:

¶25

SRI. B. VALARMATHI AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, W/O SRI. R. BHASKAR R/A NO.4, 2^ND CROSS, 1^ST A MAIN ROAD, CHOLURPALYA, MAGADI ROAD, BANGALORE-560023.

¶26

…RESPONDENT

¶27

(SRI. M.A. POOVAIAH, ADVOCATE )

¶28

THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH / SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER AT ANNEX-F DATED 06.2.2016 PASSED ON I.A.NO.2 FILED BY THE RESPONDENT UNDER SECTION 151 CPC IN

¶29

3 - NC: 2023:KHC:42992 WP No. 37182 of 2016 C/W WP No. 8216 of 2016

¶30

O.S.568/2015 ON THE FILE OF XXII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BANGALORE (CCH NO.7) BY ISSUE OF AN APPROPRIATE WRIT OR DIRECTION AS THE CASE MAY BE.

¶31

THESE PETITIONS, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

¶32

ORDER

¶33

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that with the judgment and decree dated 25.09.2023 in the suit in O.S. No.568/2015 and 569/2015 on the file of the XXII Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru, these petitions are rendered infructuous.

¶34

SD/JUDGE

¶35

Sri. S.V. Somashekar v. Sri. S. Ramachandran

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sri. S.V. Somashekar v. Sri. S. Ramachandran

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mr Sharanesh K S N Vs M/S Ryan Foods LLP

Madhu Bagroy Vs Adarsh Palm Retreat Gulmohar Residents Apartments Welfare Association

R.S. Rock Sand Vs the Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Taxes

Smt Malathi a S Vs Mr H K Nagaraju

Sri Mohammed Kaleem Vs M/S Maxworth Realty India Limited

Sri. Mohammed Samiulla Vs Sri. Syed Imran