Smt Malathi a S v. Mr H K Nagaraju
Case brief
What is this about?
In a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging an order passed by an Addl. Civil Judge, one of the petitioners appeared as counsel but no one appeared on behalf of the other petitioners. The Court noted the absence of the petitioners in person concluded they were not interested in pursuing the matter and dismissed the petition for default.
What did the court decide?
The writ petition was dismissed for default due to the non-appearance of the petitioners.