High Court of Karnataka dismissed a writ petition filed by a petitioner under Articles 226 and 226 of the Constitution seeking to quash an order of the Land Tribunal, as the petitioner had filed a memo seeking leave to withdraw the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP No. 35700 of 2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF MARCH, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT WRIT PETITION NO. 35700 OF 2013 (LR-SEC 48A)
BETWEEN:
UMME-SUMAIYA W/O HAFIZ-UR-AHAMED, AGE 31 YEARS, R/O BELUR, OPP. YAGACHI QUARATERS, HALEBEDU ROAD, BELUR-573113.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI DARSHAN GOWDA, ADV.)
AND:
Digitally signed by MARIGANGAIAH PREMAKUMARI Location: High Court of Karnataka
WP No. 35700 of 2013
BARHOME MAIN ROAD, R.T. NAGAR, TUMKUR572107.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI V SESHU, HCGP FOR R1-R4 V/O DATED 29.07.2019 NOTICE TO R5 H/S)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER OF LEARNED TRIBUNAL DATED 30.07.1981 VIDE ANNX-E AND DECLARE THAT THE PETITIONER IS THE TENANT AND IN VIEW OF THE LAW DECLARED BY THIS COURT IN SEENA SERAGARA CASE ILR 1985 KARNATAKA 805 AND CONSEQUENTLY ALLOW THE APPLN FILED BY THE PETITIONER IN FORM NO.7 VIDE ANNX-C DATED 25.12.1974.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner files
memo dated 14.03.2023 seeking leave to withdraw the
writ petition.
Writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/JUDGE
NC CT:bms List No.: 1 Sl No.: 53
Umme-Sumaiya W/o Hafiz-Ur-Ahamed
The State of Karnataka
The Land Tribunal
Assistant Commissioner Sakaleshpura
The Thasildar Belur Taluk
Smt. Hasseinabonu
S.G. Pandit
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
