Writ petition filed challenging lack of requisites for land records disposal. Court recorded a memo indicating completion of administrative work and allowed the petitioners' submission, dismissing the writ.
None; writ petition disposed of following satisfaction that required administrative work was completed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP No. 2602 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF MARCH, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT WRIT PETITION NO. 2602 OF 2023 (KLR-RR/SUR)
BETWEEN:
…PETITIONERS
Digitally signed by MARIGANGAIAH PREMAKUMARI Location: High Court of Karnataka
(BY SRI. KASHINATH J D, ADVOCATE)
AND:
WP No. 2602 of 2023
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI V SESHU, HCGP)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT TO R-3 TO MAKE COUNTER SIGNATURE OR ANY OTHER REQUISITE ADMINISTRATIVE WORK PURSUANT TO LETTER AND CONNECTED FILE BEARING BHU.SA/NI(YU)/DPR/09/21-22 DTD 20.10.2022 WRITTEN BY THE R-4 TO R-3 VIDE ANNX-H. AND ETC.,
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
WP No. 2602 of 2023
ORDER
Memo dated 14.03.2023 is filed by the learned High Court Government Pleader enclosing Phodi and Durasti sketch along with other supporting documents. The same is taken on record.
Sd/JUDGE
VP
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Smt Ramakka & Ors
The State of Karnataka & Ors
S.G. Pandit
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
