Petitioner challenged an E-tender notification issued in 2015. Court held the Petition rendered infructuous as the period under the tender had expired and dismissed it.
Writ Petition dismissed as having been rendered infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2023:KHC:20978 WP No. 35486 of 2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF JUNE, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA WRIT PETITION NO. 35486 OF 2015 (GM-TEN)
BETWEEN:
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. ANANDA B V., ADVOCATE)
AND:
…RESPONDENT
Digitally signed by BELUR RANGADHAMA NANDINI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
(BY SRI. NARAYANA REDDY., ADVOCATE)
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE E-TENDER NOTIFICATION DATED 17.8.2015 VIDE ANN-A, B, C, D, E ISSUED BY RESPONDENT AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
NC: 2023:KHC:20978 WP No. 35486 of 2015
ORDER
Learned Counsel for the Petitioner submits that in the present Petition the e-tender Notification dated 17.8.2015 has been challenged and the period of the same is for one year. Hence, the above Writ Petition has been rendered infructuous.
dismissed as having been rendered infructuous.
Sd/JUDGE
ND
List No.: 1 Sl No.: 9
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Writ Petition challenging the E-tender notification dated 17.8.2015 should be allowed given that its period had expired.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
N. VISHWANATH S/O NARAYANAPPA
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER ZILLA PANCHAYATH, KOLAR DISTRICT
C.M. POONACHA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
