Disposed

G Hidayathullah v. the Director of Higher Education

Karnataka HC27 Mar 2023WP/351/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Karnataka, in a preliminary hearing of a writ petition seeking direction for reconsideration of representations regarding pension and seniority, directed Respondent 2 to consider the petitioner's submissions within eight weeks, clarified no opinion on merits was formed, and disposed of the petition.

What did the court decide?

Order directed Respondent 2 to consider representations dated 17th October 2022 within eight weeks of receipt of the order.

G Hidayathullah Vs the Director of Higher… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Karnataka HC (2023)

¶1

¶2

WP NO.351 OF 2023

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶4

DATED THIS THE 27^TH DAY OF MARCH, 2023

¶5

BEFORE

¶6

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S. INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.351 OF 2023 (S-RES)

¶7

BETWEEN:

¶8

G. HIDAYATHULLAH S/O G. BASHA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS RESIDING AT NO .51, 2^ND FLOOR, SHIVAJI ROAD, SHIVAJINAGAR, BENGALURU – 560 051.

¶9

…PETITIONER

¶10

(BY SRI. SYED KHALEEL PASHA, ADVOCATE)

¶11

AND:

¶12

THE DIRECTOR OF HIGHER EDUCATION OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER FOR PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS, NRUPATHUNGA ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 001.

¶13

Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: High Court of Karnataka

¶14

THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS, BENGALURU SOUTH-2 DISTRICT, KALASIPALYAM, BENGALURU – 560 011.

¶15

THE SECRETARY GENERAL MUSLIM ASSOCIATION OF KARNATAKA, CMA BOYS HIGH SCHOOL, AS CHAR STREET, BENGALURU - 560 052.

¶16

…RESPONDENTS

¶17

(BY SRI. T.P. SRINIVASA, PRL. GA FOR R1 & R2; VIDE ORDER DATED 27.03.2023, NOTICE TO R3 IS DISPENSED WITH)

¶18

¶19

WP NO.351 OF 2023

¶20

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATIONS DATED 17^TH OCTOBER, 2022 VIDE ANNEXURES ‘C’ AND ‘D’; DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO APPROVE PENSION AS WELL AS SENIORITY; AND ETC.

¶21

THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

¶22

O R D E R

¶23

In this petition, the petitioner has sought for

¶24

direction to the respondents to consider the representations dated 17^th October, 2022 (Annexures ‘C’ and ‘D’) made by him to the respondents.

¶25

Heard Sri. Syed Kaleel Pasha, learned counsel

¶26

appearing for the petitioner and Sri. T.P. Srinivasa, learned Prl. Government Advocate appearing for

¶27

respondents 1 and 2.

¶28

Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties, respondent No.2 herein is directed to consider the representations dated 17^th October, 2022 (Annexures ‘C’ and ‘D’), within an outer limit of eight weeks from the

¶29

¶30

WP NO.351 OF 2023

¶31

date of receipt of this order. It is made clear that this

¶32

court has not expressed any opinion on merits of the case.

¶33

Accordingly, writ petition is disposed of.

¶34

SD/JUDGE

¶35

ARK

G Hidayathullah v. the Director of Higher Education

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

G Hidayathullah v. the Director of Higher Education

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt Susheela Vs the Chairman

Ms Diana Jose Vs State of Karnataka

Santhosha a J Vs the State of Karnataka

Kiran Kumar C Vs State of Karnataka

The Management of T.B.S.F Pre University Vs Shivaramu R

Sri S Rajashekara Vs State of Karnataka