Disposed

Sri. T M Narayanaswamy v. the Principal Secretary

Karnataka HC20 Mar 2023WP/34840/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court disposed of the writ petition, granting liberty to the petitioner to approach the Hon'ble Justice K.N. Keshavanarayana Committee. The occupation of the petitioner's site shall not be disturbed pending the committee's outcome. Contentions were kept open.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to approach Justice K.N. Keshavanarayana Committee; occupation of site not to be disturbed pending committee decision.

Sri. T M Narayanaswamy Vs the Principal Secretary — Land Acquisition | Karnataka HC (2023)

¶1

¶2

WP No. 34840 of 2018

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶4

DATED THIS THE 20^TH DAY OF MARCH, 2023

¶5

BEFORE

¶6

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNA S DIXIT

¶7

WRIT PETITION NO. 34840 OF 2018 (LA-BDA)

¶8

BETWEEN:

¶9

SRI. T M NARAYANASWAMY S/O MUNISHAMAPPA, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, R/AT THANISANDRA VILLAGE, K.R.PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK. SENIOR CITIZEN BENEFIT NOT CLAIMED

¶10

…PETITIONER

¶11

(BY SRI. M SHIVAPRAKASH.,ADVOCATE)

¶12

AND:

¶13

Digitally signed by CHETAN B C Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶14

THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT, M.S.BUILDING, BANGALORE-01.

¶15

THE COMMISSIONER, BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-20.

¶16

THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-20.

¶17

…RESPONDENTS

¶18

(BY SRI.SRIDHAR HEGDE., AGA FOR R1; SRI. KIRAN C V.,ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)

¶19

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE ENTIRE RECORDS FROM THE R-2 AND 3 IN RESPECT

¶20

¶21

WP No. 34840 of 2018

¶22

OF THE LAND BEARING SY NO.34/1 OF THANISANDRA VILLAGE, K.R.PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK AND ISSUE WRIT OF MANDAMUS AGAINST R-2 AND 3 TO CONSIDER THE REPRSENTATION DTD12.1.2017 AT ANNEXURE-K TO RE-DO AND DELETE THE LAND MEASURING 0-8.1/2 GUNTAS IN SY NO.34/1 WITH EXISTING DWELLING HOUSES AND DEVELOPMENT MADE BY THE PETITIONER AND ETC.,

¶23

THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN B GROUP THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

¶24

ORDER

¶25

The subject matter of this Writ Petition is substantially similar to the one in W.P.No.51929/2014 and Connected Matters, between K.P.ANJANAPPA VS. STATE OF KARNATAKA AND OTHERS, disposed off, by a Coordinate Bench of this Court on 27.09.2021, granting some reprieve to the litigants therein.

¶26

Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that

¶27

his client also needs to be granted same relief as has been accorded to the litigants in the cognate petition in the absence of any derogatory factors. Learned Senior Panel Counsel appearing for the Respondents does not much dispute this submission and agrees that the Petitioner be given liberty to approach the Hon’ble Justice

¶28

¶29

WP No. 34840 of 2018

¶30

K.N.Keshavanarayana Committee for redressal of his

¶31

grievance, in accordance with law.

¶32

Ordered accordingly & Writ Petition is disposed off,

¶33

all contentions having been kept open.

¶34

The occupation of the parties in the subject site shall not be disturbed till after and subject to the outcome of decision of Hon’ble Justice K.N.Keshavanarayana Committee.

¶35

No costs.

¶36

Sd/JUDGE

¶37

Snb/

Sri. T M Narayanaswamy v. the Principal Secretary

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sri. T M Narayanaswamy v. the Principal Secretary

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt Gowramma Vs the State of Karnataka

Nirman Shelters Bangalore Pvt. Ltd. Vs the State of Karnataka

Smt. Tanusri Jain Vs Bangalore Development Authority

Smt Sujathamma Vs the Commission

M/S Kempegowda Rural House Building Vs the State of Karnataka

M/S Kempegowda Rural House Building Vs the State of Karnataka