The High Court of Karnataka dismissed a writ petition praying to quash an impugned order passed in 2015. The bench held that the eight-year delay and laches could not be condoned.
Writ petition dismissed on the ground of delay and laches.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2023:KHC:38472 WP No. 22524 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.22524 OF 2023 (KLR-RES)
BETWEEN:
SRI. N. VENKATESH, S/O VENKATAIAH, AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURIST, R/AT NO. G-8351, 4TH CROSS, GUTTALU COLONY, MANDYA, MANDYA DISTRICT - 571401.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. RAJA L., ADVOCATE)
AND:
Digitally signed by ARUN KUMAR M S Location: High Court of Karnataka
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. MOHAMMED JAFFAR SHAH, AGA )
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE RESPONDENT 1 PASSING THE IMPUGNED ORDER IN LRF NO.338/2014-15 PASSED ON 04.08.2015 SAME IS MARKED AS ANNEXURE-E.
NC: 2023:KHC:38472 WP No. 22524 of 2023
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
List No.: 1 Sl No.: 32
SD/JUDGE
sac
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay of eight years in filing the writ petition can be condoned.
SRI. N. VENKATESH
THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, SUB-DIVISION, MANDYA
THE TAHASILDHAR SRIRANGAPATNA TALUK
E.S.INDIRESH
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
