Partly allowed

Sri.C. Venkatesh v. the State of Karnataka

Karnataka HC30 Oct 2023WP/3979/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought writ regarding land measurement. Court permitted withdrawal of the writ petition with liberty to make one more representation to the competent authority, which will be considered per applicable revenue laws and rules.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition disposed of on withdrawal with liberty to make one more representation to the competent authority considerable under relevant revenue laws and rules.

Sri.C. Venkatesh Vs the State of Karnataka — Land Acquisition | Karnataka HC (2023)

¶1

¶2

NC: 2023:KHC:38278 WP No. 3979 of 2023

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶4

DATED THIS THE 30^TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2023

¶5

BEFORE

¶6

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.3979 OF 2023 (KLR-RES)

¶7

BETWEEN:

¶8

SRI.C. VENKATESH S/O LATE CHIKKA MARIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS R/AT HOSAHALLI VILLAGE MARALAVADI HOBLI KANAKAPURA TALUK-562117 RAMANAGARA DISTRICT.

¶9

…PETITIONER

¶10

(BY SRI. LOURDU MARIYAPPA A., ADVOCATE)

¶11

AND:

¶12

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY

¶13

Digitally signed by ARUN KUMAR M S Location: High Court of Karnataka

¶14

DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE M S BUILDING DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BENGALURU-560001.

¶15

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER RAMANAGARA DISTRICT OFFICE RAMANAGARA DISTRICT-562159.

¶16

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER RAMANAGARA CITY RAMANAGARA DISTRICT-562159.

¶17

THE THASILDAR

¶18

¶19

NC: 2023:KHC:38278 WP No. 3979 of 2023

¶20

…RESPONDENTS

¶21

KANAKAPURA TALUK RAMANAGARA DISTRICT-562159.

¶22

(BY SRI. HARISHA A.S., AGA)

¶23

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE WRIT OF MANDAMUS, THEREBY TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION GIVEN BY THE PETITIONER AS ON 10/11/1998 TO THE RESPONDENT NO.4 PERTAINING TO THE LAND BEARING SY.NO.12, MEASURING ONE ACRE GUNTAS OF LAND SITUATED IN T.HOSAHALLI VILLAGE, MARALVADI HOBLI, KANAKAPURA TALUK, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT AS ANNEXUREA.

¶24

THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

¶25

ORDER

¶26

After arguing the matter for some time, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to make one more representation to the

¶27

competent authority. If such a representation is made, same shall be considered in accordance with law and

¶28

¶29

NC: 2023:KHC:38278 WP No. 3979 of 2023

¶30

following the guidelines made in Rule 108 of the Karnataka Land Revenue Rules, 1966 and Section 94A of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964.

¶31

Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of.

¶32

Registry is directed to return the original / certified

¶33

copies to the petitioner after retaining xerox copies of the same.

¶34

SD/JUDGE

¶35

sac

¶36

List No.: 1 Sl No.: 15

Sri.C. Venkatesh v. the State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sri.C. Venkatesh v. the State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Abdul Wazid S/O Late Bakhar Alisha Vs State of Karnataka

Sri. S.D. Lakshmana S/O Dasegowda Vs the State of Karnataka

Sri. Krishna Prasad H.K., Vs the State of Karnataka

Sri N S Maligappa Vs the State of Karnataka

Sri Avalappa Vs the State of Karnataka

Smt. Narayanamma Vs State of Karnataka