Hanumantha v. the State of Karnataka
Case brief
What is this about?
2023:KHC:36651 WP No. 22421 of 2023 IN THE…
2023:KHC:36651 WP No. 22421 of 2023 IN THE…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.I.ARUN WRIT PETITION NO. 22421 OF 2023 (CS-EL/M)
BETWEEN:
S/O LATE HANUMEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS
SHARE NO. 3
Digitally signed by V KRISHNA Location: High Court of Karnataka
NC: 2023:KHC:36651 WP No. 22421 of 2023
AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS SHARE NO. 24,
SHARE NO. 53
S/O KEMPEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS SHARE NO. 54
15. RAJESH
S/O KAMSEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS SHARE NO. 57
17. POORNIMA
W/O DODDABETTAIAH AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS SHARE NO. 59
18. THAYAMMA
W/O CHIKKAMARIGOWDA AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS SHARE NO. 64
19. HANUMEGOWDA
S/O LATE KEMPEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS SHARE NO. 66
21. MANUKUMARA
S/O HANUMANTHEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS SHARE NO. 75
22. RENUKA
W/O KEMPEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS SHARE NO. 76
23. KEMPEGOWDA
S/O LATE DODIREGOWDA AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS SHARE NO. 77
24. JAYAMMA
W/O KEMPEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS SHARE NO. 79
25. K NANDINI
W/O B. K. NAGENDRA AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS SHARE NO. 33
26. THAMMAIAH
S/O MODAIAH AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS SHARE NO. 81
27. BASAVARAJU
S/O LATE HANUMEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS SHARE NO.
28. SAVITHRAMMA
W/O BASAVARAJU AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS SHARE NO. 88
29. SHIVAMARI
S/O LATE SUBBEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS SHARE NO. 132
30. THAYAMMA
W/O S. NANJUNDEGOWDA AGED 39 YEARS SHARE NO. 154
S/O KEMPEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS SHARE NO. 156
S/O CHIKKASWAMY AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS SHARE NO. 174
33. SUMA
W/O HANUMANTHEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS SHARE NO. 89
35. RATHNAMMA
W/O K. NANJUNDEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS SHARE NO. 100
36. NANJUNDASWAMY
S/O LATE CHOWDEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS SHARE NO. 101
38. NAGARAJU
S/O LATE SUBBEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS SHARE NO. 107
39. SAVITHA
W/O NAGARAJU AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS SHARE NO. 108
40. NAGALAKSHMI
W/O KRISHNA AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS SHARE NO. 109
41. KRISHNA
S/O LATE PUTTASWAMYGOWDA AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS SHARE NO. 110
NC: 2023:KHC:36651 WP No. 22421 of 2023
42. SANNAMMA
W/O EREGOWDA AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS SHARE NO. 119
43. PAVITHRA
W/O RAJESH AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS SHARE NO. 180
44. RAMACHANDRA
S/O LATE HANUMEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS SHARE NO. 181
45. ERAJU
S/O LATE HANUMEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS SHARE NO. 182
46. SAVITHA
W/O SHIVAMARI AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS SHARE NO. 195
47. RAVIKUMAR B. R
S/O RAJANNA AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS SHARE NO. 196
48. SUJATHA
W/O NANJUNDEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS SHARE NO. 206
ALL ARE RESIDING AT: V. BASAPURA VILLAGE HALAGUR HOBLI, MALAVALLI TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT - 571 421
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. RUDRAPPA P, ADVOCATE (ABSENT) )
AND:
CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD. A REGISTERED CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY UNDER THE KARNATAKA CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES ACT 1959
V BASAPURA VILLAGE, MALAVALLI TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT - 571 421 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY
V. BASAPURA MILK PRODUCERS CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD.
V. BASAPURA VILLAGE MALAVALLI TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT - 571 421
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI SIDHARTH, AGA FOR R1, R3, R4; SRI T.L. KIRAN KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R5)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE ACT OF THE R2 IN DISQUALIFYING THE PETITIONERS FROM THE ELIGIBLE VOTERS LIST IS VIOLATIVE OF RULE 13(D) (3) AND PROVISO TO THE KARNATAKA CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES ACT, 1959 BY ALLOWING THIS WRIT PETITION VIDE ANNEXURE-B AND ETC.,
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioners is absent.
Learned AGA appearing on behalf of respondent Nos.1, 3 and 4 submits that the election to respondent No.2 - Society was conducted on 08.10.2023 and the petitioners have prayed for a right to cast their vote in the said election and that the writ petition has become infructuous.
For the aforementioned reasons, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Sd/JUDGE
MKM List No.: 3 Sl No.: 21 CT: BHK
Hanumantha
Nanjundegowda
Kempengowda
Ashamma
Ananda B S S
Gowramma
M. I. Arun
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court