Appeal against a Motor Court judgment awarding compensation was dismissed after the appellant's counsel filed a memo seeking withdrawal of the appeal on the same day.
The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2023:KHC:36401 MFA No. 6567 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.I.ARUN MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.6567 OF 2023 (MV-DM)
BETWEEN:
G. CHANDRASHEKAR, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, S/O RAMANNA GOWDA, R/O NO. 3/48 BADDADKA HOUSE, ALETTI POST AND VILLAGE, SULLIA TALUK, DAKSHINA, KANNADA DISTRICT - 574 239.
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI. VISHWANATHA POOJARY K., ADVOCATE)
AND:
Digitally signed by H K HEMA Location: High Court of Karnataka
…RESPONDENTS
THIS MFA IS FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 01.08.2023 PASSED IN MVC NO. 1263/2021 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND J.M.F.C., ADDITIONAL MACT, PUTTUR, DAKSHINA KANNADA, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Sd/JUDGE
RCK
List No.: 2 Sl No.: 4
G. Chandrashekar
Mohammad Noushad M.A.
The Divisional Manager, New India Assurance Co. Ltd.
M.I.Arun
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
