Writ petition filed under Article 226 to quash a notice and stay impugned order. Petition was dismissed as withdrawn at the hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP No. 19064 of 2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF MARCH, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 19064 OF 2018 (GM-RES)
BETWEEN:
SINCE DEAD REPRESENTED BY, PETITIONER NO2 AND ALONG WITH, LRS' MENTIONED BELOW.
Digitally signed by MOHANKUMAR M Location: High Court of Karnataka
BOTH ARE RESIDING AT, NO.199, 2ND CROSS, 1ST BLOCK, KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU - 560 034.
BOTH RESIDING AT: NO.199, 2ND CROSS, 1ST BLOCK, KORAMANGALA, BENGALORE - 560 084.
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. MALLIKARJUN N K., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. A SAMPATH., ADVOCATE)
AND:
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. V SHIVA REDDY., HCGP)
WP No. 19064 of 2018
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED NOTICE DTD 09.04.2018 ADDRESSED BY THE R-1 TO THE R-2 VIDE ANNX-Q. GRANT AN INTERIM ORDER TO STAY THE OPERATION OF THE IMPUGNED ORDER PASSED BY THE R-1 DTD 09.04.2018 VIDE ANNX-Q AND ETC.,
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Learned counsel for petitioner no.3 has filed a memo seeking leave of this Court to withdraw petition as petitioners
do not wish to prosecute petition.
Taking memo on record, petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/JUDGE
MKM CT: STK
Mr. K. M. Shetty and others
Karnataka Fire and Emergency Services
Ravi V Hosmani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
