Chandranayaka v. Javaranayaka
Case brief
What is this about?
Regular Second Appeal filed against orders dismissing an appeal. The court noted the death of the sole respondent. The appeal was dismissed as it abated.
Regular Second Appeal filed against orders dismissing an appeal. The court noted the death of the sole respondent. The appeal was dismissed as it abated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
RSA No. 1530 of 2009
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF MARCH, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 1530 OF 2009
BETWEEN:
Digitally signed by MOHANKUMAR M Location: High Court of Karnataka
ALL ARE RESIDING AT, KEREMEGALAKOPPALU, GULAGANJIHALL DAKALE, HALLYMYSORE HOBALI, HOLENARSIPUR TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT - 573 211.
…APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. S V ANGADI., ADVOCATE)
RSA No. 1530 of 2009
AND:
JAVARANAYAKA, S/O KAPILANAYAKA, AGE MAJOR, GALIGEKERE VILLAGE, HOSA AGRAHARA HOBLI, K R NAGAR TALUK, MYSORE DISTRICT - 5.
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. BIPIN HEGDE., ADVOCATE)
THIS RSA IS FILED U/S 100 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 11.09.2009 PASSED IN R.A.19/2004 ON THE FILE OF THE PRESIDING OFFICER FTC-III, HOLENARASIPURA, DISMISSING THE APPEAL FILED AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED:22.01.2004 PASSED IN O.S.24/1998 ON THE FILE OF THE CIVIL JUDGE(JR.DN) AND JMFC. HOLENARASIPURA.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for respondent has filed a memo dated 07.02.2023, reporting death of sole respondent on 15.03.2021.
Since steps are not taken in time, appeal is dismissed as
abated.
Sd/JUDGE
MKM CT: STK
CHANDRANAYAKA AND OTHERS
JAVARANAYAKA
RAVI V HOSMANI
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court