of 2009. The Labour Court, by order dated 25th September, 2009 (Annexure-A), allowed the reference and order of termination of service of the petitioner was set-aside with consequential relief. The said order was challenged before this Court in Writ Petition No.4589 of 2010 and this Court, by order dated 11th January, 2011, allowed the writ petition in-part and interfered with the payment of back wages only. It is contended by the petitioner that the respondent No.2 has passed an order of grant-in-aid to six posts out of seven posts as per Annexure-E dated 02nd December, 2010, leaving out the case of the petitioner on the ground that the writ petition is pending consideration before this Court. Thereafter, respondent No.2 has passed order dated 28th September, 2015 (AnnexureH), extending the benefit of grant-in-aid to the petitioner with effect from 15th June, 2015. It is the grievance of the petitioner that the respondent No.2 ought to have considered the case of the petitioner along with other employees in terms of the order dated 02nd December, 2010 (Annexure-E). Being aggrieved by the same, the petitioner presented this writ petition.
