Dismissed

Sri. M. C. Boregowda v. B. Yashoda

Karnataka HC10 Oct 2023WP/15500/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court of Karnataka dismissed Writ Petition No. 15500 of 2023. The court held that the petitioner has a statutory appeal remedy under Section 4D of the Karnataka SC/ST/ObC Act, 1990, making notice to some respondents unnecessary. The writ petition was dismissed while reserving liberty to appeal.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition stands dismissed while reserving liberty to the petitioner to prefer an appeal in terms of Section 4D of the Act, 1990.

Sri. M. C. Boregowda Vs B. Yashoda — Caste Atrocities | Karnataka HC (2023)

¶1

¶2

NC: 2023:KHC:36747 WP No. 15500 of 2023

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10^TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2023

¶4

BEFORE

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 15500 OF 2023 (GM-CC)

¶6

BETWEEN:

¶7

SRI. M. C. BOREGOWDA, S/O LATE CHENNEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, R/A NO.K21, 2ND CROSS, KALLAHALLI, MANDYA DISTRICT - 571 401.

¶8

…PETITIONER

¶9

(BY SRI. G.B. SHARATH GOWDA, ADVOCATE)

¶10

AND:

¶11

B. YASHODA, D/O M. BASAVAIAH, C/O THAMMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, RESIDING AT 3RD CROSS, HALAHALLI TENT ROAD, HALAHALLI, MANDYA - 571 401.

¶12

Digitally signed by JUANITA THEJESWINI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶13

THE DISTRICT CASTE VERIFICATION COMMITTEE, MANDYA DISTRICT, MANDYA, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN AND DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, MANDYA DISTRICT, MANDYA - 571 401.

¶14

2 - NC: 2023:KHC:36747 WP No. 15500 of 2023

¶15

THE ADDL. DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, CIVIL RIGHTS ENFORCEMENT DIRECTORATE , TECHNICAL EDUCATION BHAVAN, PALACE ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 001.

¶16

THE TAHASILDAR, MADDUR TALUK, MANDYA - 571 428.

¶17

THE POLICE SUPERINTENDENT, CIVIL RIGHTS ENFORCEMENT CELL, NO.42/A, VINAYAMARGA, SIDHARTHANAGAR, MYSURU - 570 011.

¶18

MANDYA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, AUTONOMOUS MEDICAL INSTITUTION, GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA, MANDYA - 571 401, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER.

¶19

…RESPONDENTS

¶20

(BY SRI. RAJENDRA K.R, AGA FOR R2 TO R5)

¶21

THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE REPORT DATED 7.12.2021 BY THE R-5 PRODUCED AT ANNX-A AND ETC.,

¶22

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

¶23

3 - NC: 2023:KHC:36747 WP No. 15500 of 2023

¶24

ORDER

¶25

R.DEVDAS J., (ORAL):

¶26

Learned Additional Government Advocate is directed to take notice for respondent Nos.2 to 5.

¶27

Notice to the other respondent Nos.1 and 6 is not necessary, since the petitioner has statutory appeal remedy in terms of Section 4D of the Karnataka Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes and Other Backward Classes (Reservation of Appointment, etc) Act, 1990.

¶28

Consequently, the writ petition stands dismissed while reserving liberty to the petitioner to prefer an appeal in terms of Section 4D of the Act, 1990.

¶29

Sd/JUDGE

¶30

CT: BHK

¶31

Sri. M. C. Boregowda v. B. Yashoda

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sri. M. C. Boregowda v. B. Yashoda

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sri S Nithish Vs the Indian Oil Corporation Ltd.

Deepti Antony Vs Subin Joseph

C. Gudde Channaiah Vs the State of Karnataka

D. v. Basavaraj Vs Karnataka Gramin Bank

Sri.Pradeep Kumar.S Vs M/S Canara Bank Limited

M/S Sree Sreeivas Jewellers Vs the National Co. Operative Bank Ltd.