Petitioner filed a writ petition under Articles 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India seeking to quash a family court order. The petitioner sought to withdraw the petition and prosecute the matter on merits. The court allowed withdrawal and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR
WRIT PETITION NO.14851 OF 2018 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN:
CHADURANGA KANTHRAJ URS S/O LATE K.B.RAMACHANDRARAJ URS AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS
GAYATRI VIHAR, BANGALORE PALACE GROUND RAMANA MAHARSHI ROAD, BENGALURU – 560 080
... PETITIONER (BY SRI GOVINDARAJ L AND SRI AJAY GOVINDARAJ, ADVOCATES)
AND:
... RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI AKARSH KUMAR GOWDA, ADVOCATE FOR R-1 & R-2 ; R-3 SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED)
THIS WP UNDER ARTS. 226 & 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI QUASHING THE ORDER DT 17.02.2018
2
MADE ON MEMO DATED 16.10.2017 (ANN.-C) IN OS NO.916/2015 PASSED BY THE II ADDL.SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, MYSURU TO THE EXTENT THAT IT WRONGLY PLACES THE BURDEN OF PROOF ON THE PLAINTIFF (ANNEXURE-“E”) & ETC.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING ‘B’ GROUP THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
The present writ petition is filed aggrieved by the order in challenge passed on the memo dated 16.10.2017 with regard to declaration of adoption being illegal and non-est in law. On the said memo an order came to be passed on 17.02.2018.
3
petitioner and the memo filed are placed on record.
dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/JUDGE
VK
CHADURANGA KANTHRAJ URS
YADUVEER GOPAL RAJ URS
PRAMODA DEVI WADIYAR
SUB-REGISTRAR
PRADEEP SINGH YERUR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
