Sri.S.Raju v. the State of Karnataka
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner withdrew Writ Petition No. 14631 of 2014 challenging land acquisition notifications. Court disposed of the petition as withdrawn and costs were left to petitioner.
Petitioner withdrew Writ Petition No. 14631 of 2014 challenging land acquisition notifications. Court disposed of the petition as withdrawn and costs were left to petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP No. 14631 of 2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF APRIL, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNA S DIXIT
WRIT PETITION NO. 14631 OF 2014 (LA-BDA)
BETWEEN:
SRI.S.RAJU, S/O T.G.SRINIVAS, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, M/S VIJAYANAGARA NURSING HOME, NO.46, 17TH CROSS, VIJAYANAGARA, BANGALORE-560 040.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. VENKATESH T S.,ADVOCATE)
AND:
Digitally signed by CHETAN B C Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. SRIDHAR HEGDE., AGA FOR R1; SRI. B S KARTHIKEYAN., ADVOCATE FOR R2)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE SCHEME CALLED "CHANDRA LAYOUT" IN RESPECT OF ITEM NO.1 TO 4 OF SCHEDULE PROPERTIES SITUATED AT KEMPAPURA AGRAHARA VILLAGE, KASABA
WP No. 14631 of 2014
HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK, VIDE PRELIMINARY NOTIFICATION DTD.30.7.1977 ISSUED BY R-2 (ANNEX-A) AND FINAL NOTIFICATION DTD.10.5.1978 ISSUED BY THE R-1 (ANNEX-B) ARE LAPSED UNDER SEC.27 OF THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITIES ACT AND GRANT ALL CONSEQUENTIAL RELIEF/S THERETO AND ETC.,
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN B GROUP THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Learned counsel for the Petitioner has filed a Memo dated 11.4.2023 seeking withdrawal of the petition. The said Memo being taken on record, reads as under:
“The undersigned counsel submit that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to dismiss the above Petition as not pressed/withdrawn, in the interest of justice & equity.”
Ordered accordingly, Writ Petition is disposed off as
having been withdrawn, costs made easy.
Sd/JUDGE
cbc
SRI.S.RAJU
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
KRISHNA S DIXIT
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court