In Writ Petition No. 126418 of 2020, the High Court of Karnataka at Dharwad Bench disposed of a petition challenging a compromise decree. The petitioners filed a withdrawal memo, and the court dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn.
Writ petition dismissed as filed memo prayer.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2023:KHC-D:7296 WP No. 126418 of 2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF JULY, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR WRIT PETITION NO. 126418 OF 2020 (GM-RES)
BETWEEN:
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI S.B. HEBBALLI, ADVOCATE)
ROHAN HADIMANI T
Digitally signed by ROHAN HADIMANI T Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad
AND:
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI GANESH RAIBAGI, ADV. FOR RESPONDENT NO.2) (NOTICE TO RESPONDENT NO.1 IS SERVED)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI QUASHING THE IMPUGNED COMPROMISE DECREE DATED 13.10.2014 IN O.S.NO.108/2014 PASSED BY THE LOKADALAT (I ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, BAGALKOT) A COPY OF WHICH IS PRODUCED AS PER ANNEXURE-B.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioners files a memo
dated 14.07.2023 which reads as under :
"That as the above mentioned writ
petition is settled out of court, it is prayed
that the case may be dismissed as
withdrawn."
Placing the memo and submission of learned counsel
on record, petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/JUDGE
Ckk
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Basappa S/o. Mukkanna Swagi @ Hotti
Parvatevva W/o. Basappa Swagi @ Hotti
Umesh S/o. Basappa Swagi @ Hotti
Gangappa S/o. Basappa Swagi @ Hotti
Pradeep Singh Yerur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
