Writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 seeking quashing of a letter of motion. The court dismissed the petition as infructuous on the ground that the petitioner had completed his term.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2023:KHC-D:7250 WP No. 100002 of 2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF JULY, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR
WRIT PETITION NO. 100002 OF 2018 (LB-RES)
BETWEEN:
SMT. JAYA NARAYAN MADIWAL, AGE: 40 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURIST, PRESIDENT OF GRAM PANCHAYAT, VALAGALLI, R/O: HARODI, POST: VALAGALLI, TQ: KUMTA, DIST: KARWAR, PIN CODE: 581332.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI S.V. YAJI, ADVOCATE)
AND:
ROHAN HADIMANI T
Digitally signed byROHAN HADIMANI T Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI PRASHANT V. MOGALI, HCGP FOR RESP.NO.1) (BY SRI A.P. HEGDE, SRI JANMANE AND SRI VIJAY MALALI, ADVOCATES FOR REPONDENT NOS. 2 TO 12)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI AND QUASH THE LETTER OF MOTION SUBMITTED TO THE RESPONDENT NO.1 BY THE RESPONDENTS NO.2 TO 12 DATED 23/12/2017 VIDE ANNEXURE-A TO THIS WRIT PETITION; CONSEQUENTLY THE NOTICE ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.1 IN FORM NO.2 AT NO. CHUNAVANE/VIVA/48/2017-18 DATED 26/12/2017 VIDE ANNEXURE-B MAY KINDLY BE SET ASIDE THE ILLEGAL.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Learned counsel Sri S.V.Yaji appeared through video
conferencing and learned counsel for respondent Nos.2 to
12 appeared physically before this Court.
NC: 2023:KHC-D:7250 WP No. 100002 of 2018
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of petitioner having completed his term, this writ petition would not survive for consideration.
Placing the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner, petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Sd/JUDGE
CKK
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition survives for consideration after the petitioner has completed his term
Smt. Jaya Narayan Madiwal
Rohan Hadimani T
The Assistant Commissioner, Kumta Sub-Division, Kumta, Dist: Karwar
Hanumanth Masti Patagar
Manjunath Timanna Gouda
Smt. Shashikala Prakash Naik
Pradeep Singh Yerur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
