Writ petition challenging a demand notice under the SARFAESI Act was rendered infructuous as the respondent bank conceded that the impugned notice would be withdrawn, leading to dismissal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP No. 1209 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF MARCH, 2023 BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 1209 OF 2023 (GM-RES)
BETWEEN:
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. SANDHYA U. PRABHU, ADVOCATE)
AND:
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. K.V.LOKESH, ADVOCATE)
WP No. 1209 of 2023
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE DEMAND NOTICE ISSUED BY RESPONDENT U/S 13(2) OF THE SARFAESI ACT DATED 03.11.2022, PRODUCED AT ANNEXUREF.
THIS WRIT PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Sri. K.V. Lokesh, learned counsel appearing for the respondent - Bank would submit that the demand notice dated 03.11.2022 issued against the petitioner, which is impugned in the subject petition would be withdrawn.
rendered infructuous, on the ground that the impugned notice dated 03.11.2022 itself is being withdrawn.
Sd/JUDGE
JY
CT: AVB
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Sri. J S Umashankar
M/S. Tumkur Veerashaiva Padmavathi B K Co-operative Bank
M. Nagaprashanna
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
