Smt. Beena v. Union of India
Case brief
What is this about?
In a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 seeking direction to serve an impugned lookout circular, the High Court of Karnataka disposed of the petition as not pressed upon the petitioner's request due to settlement and part payment of the loan liability.
What did the court decide?
Writ petition dismissed as not pressed with liberty to approach this Hon'ble Court when need arises.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
- 1 -
NC: 2023:KHC:43456 WP No. 11188 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF DECEMBER, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 11188 OF 2023 (GM-RES)
BETWEEN:
SMT. BEENA W/O VIDYA SAGAR, AGED ABOUT 48 YERS, R/AT: FLAT NO.401, BIANCA APARTMENTS, BEJAI, MANGALURU – 575 004.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. AJAY PRABHU M., ADVOCATE)
AND:
- UNION OF INDIA
Digitally signed by PADMAVATHI B K Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to exercise jurisdiction under Articles 226 and 227 to direct respondents to serve the impugned lookout circular against petitioner.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Smt. Beena W/o Vidya Sagar
- respondent
Union of India
- respondent
Bureau of Immigration
- respondent
The Bank of Baroda
- respondent
The Authorized Officer Bank of Baroda
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Karnataka HC
- Decided on
- · December
- Registered
- Case no.
- WP/11188/2023
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court